What is Truth, and Why does it Matter?

Jesus said, “Everyone who is of the truth listens to my voice.” Pilate said to him, “What is truth?” ~John 18:37-38.

About 20 years ago, I was discussing theology and Christianity with a shop owner of musical instruments in Nanuet, NY. In the end, he asked the same question that Pontius Pilate did in the Biblical quote above. Unfortunately, I didn’t have the answers that I do now, and I wish I could go back to the time of that conversation.

The question, “what is truth?” is a great question, and the answer to it is easier than one might think. I first heard of this discovery in several different works from Norman Geisler[1] and J. P. Moreland.[2] Together, their writings on truth sparked a fire in me to memorize the Three Fundamental Laws and what they mean. Before I get to the Three Fundamental Laws of Logic, I think it is appropriate to show what makes the ability to know the truth so valuable.

For starters, Jesus says that “knowing the truth will set a person free” (John 8:32). Who doesn’t want to be free? Jesus is referring to the truth of the Gospel in this context. It develops into an argument about the deity of Jesus.

The truth will tell us about danger. “That stove is hot!” “There is a grizzly bear over there!” “Satan prowls around like a roaring lion!”

Knowing the truth is valuable because it reveals the distinctions in different religions and worldviews. For instance, Islam teaches that Jesus never died, but Christianity teaches the opposite of that. Mormonism teaches that god is one of many who are worshiped (monolatry). Baha’is believe that there is only one god, but that all religions describe this god. Atheism says that there is no god, Hinduism teaches that there are many gods, Jews believe that there is a monotheistic Unitarian god, Christians believe in a monotheistic, Trinitarian God, New Agers believe that all is god, and Christian Scientists believe that love is god (idolatry). The questions is, which of these are true?! If any?!

Knowing what is true can also help us understand the meaning, value, and purpose for and of life. For instance, is it true that God loves us? What does it mean if He did? What does it mean if He did not exist?

The Three Fundamental Laws of Logic

The first Fundamental Law of Logic is very simple. In fact, it is so simple that most people do not even think about it. It is called the Law of Identity. The Law of Identity states that a thing is identical to itself. If I were to point to a dying tree and say, “that tree is dying,” then this claim would be identical to reality if that were the case. The key to understanding this, I believe, is in the word, “claim” or, “statement.”[3] Look at the claim, and measure it up against reality. Is that tree dying?” If so, then it is identical to the claim that the tree is dying. In other words, it is true.

The second Fundamental Law of Logic is also very simple, and we use it all the time as well. It is called the Law of Non-contradiction.[4] This law states that a claim cannot be both true and false at the same time and in the same sense. For instance, a woman cannot be both pregnant, and not pregnant, at the same time and in the same sense. The same is true for many of the ideas listed above. It cannot be both true that Jesus died on the cross and true that He did not die on the cross. These claims contradict one another.

The third Fundamental Law of Logic goes a little further (and I prefer the model that J. P. Moreland uses in teaching the Three Laws because it seems to have an orderly progression, if nothing else but for mnemonic purposes), which is called the Law of Excluded Middle. The Law of Excluded Middle also looks at the claim and says that every truth claim must be either true or false. To simplify this, just think of the phrase “The Law of Excluded Middle” as a long way to say the word, “or.” True or false… this is not a false dilemma, there are no other alternatives. To use a familiar idea, a woman is either pregnant, or she is not. The light switch is either on or it is not. Jesus either died and rose again or He did not. Islam is true or it is false.

The Three Fundamental Laws of Logic really help us get to the bottom of things, so to speak. For instance, speaking of the Resurrection of Jesus, this event is either identical to the truth or it is false. The thing is, if it is not true, then Paul says that our Christian faith is futile (1 Corinthians 15:17). He is basically taunting people to investigate the truth claims of Christianity for themselves. On the contrary, if the Resurrection was an actual event in history, then what does this mean for us? It means that all other religions are false, for one thing. For another thing, as Paul says in 1 Corinthians 15, Christ died for our sins.

For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, 4 that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures, 5 and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. 6 Then he appeared to more than five hundred brothers at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have fallen asleep. 7 Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles. 8 Last of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared also to me.[5]

Christ died for our sins. He was buried. He was raised on the Third Day. He appeared to many. Like I said, if this is the case, if these claims are identical to reality, then this is “Good News.” The good news is at minimum, twofold. 1. We are saved from the wrath of God.[6] Jesus took our place on the cross and took our place of eternal punishment. We no longer need to fear the wrath of God because of our sins because we are covered by the blood of Jesus, and because we are covered in His blood, when the Father looks at us, He sees His Son! 2. Because we are covered by the blood of Jesus, we have eternal life in Him![7] Those of us who place our trust and hope in Jesus will live forever![8]

Now, I mentioned above, that knowing what is true can also help us understand the meaning, value, and purpose for and of life. “If each individual person passes out of existence when he dies, then what ultimate meaning can be given to his life?”[9] The point here is that because God exists, because Christianity is true and we live for eternity, then life does have meaning. Having and living life does make a difference. Why? Because God created you, and He wants to have a personal relationship with you. Yes, the King of the Universe wants to have a personal relationship with you!

“If life ends at the grave, then it makes no difference whether one had lived as a Stalin or a saint.”[10] There is a value to how we live. It does matter how a person lives because in the end, he or she will be confronted by the King of the Universe on how they lived.

The purpose of life also depends on the existence of God and the fact that we live for eternity. If it is true that God exists, and that we do live for eternity through Jesus Christ, which I do affirm, then there is hope for mankind. HOPE FOR MANKIND. Let that echo in your minds.

I think we can all see the value in the Three Fundamental Laws of Logic. It is time that we put them into practice.

Practice using the Three Fundamental Laws of Logic with these truth claims:

A fetus does not feel pain.

Adultery is no big deal.

Guns kill people.

The Bible is the Word of God.

The truth can be known.

I can’t write a single word in English.

Jesus loves me.

There is Hope for mankind.

What other truth claims are worth your time to investigate?

Written by Nace Howell through the grace of the Lord Jesus

[1] Norman Geisler. Baker Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics. Baker Books: Grand Rapids, 2000. 427.

[2] J. P. Moreland and William Lane Craig. Philosophical Foundations for a Christian Worldview. InterVarsity Press: Downers Grove, 2017. 120.

[3] Statement, as J. P. Moreland seems to use in most of his writings.

[4] Or, more simply, the Law of Contradiction.

[5] See 1 Corinthians 15:3-8.

[6] See Romans 5:1-8.

[7] See John 3:16; Romans 6:23.

[8] See Romans 10:9.

[9] William Lane Craig. Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics. Crossway: Wheaton, 2008. 72.

[10] Ibid. 74.

Comments

How to Show a Mormon the Difference Between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus

I find that Mormons frequently claim that they are Christians, and that they want to be referred to as Christians, and that they have even recently sought to distance themselves from the word “Mormon.” The problem is, they worship another Jesus, and here is how to show them the difference between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus. Before we get to that, some clarifications are necessary. Specifically, that they cannot even distance themselves from being called "Mormons." The Mormon President Russell Nelson said, “What’s in a name or, in this case, a nickname? When it comes to nicknames of the Church, such as the “LDS Church,” the “Mormon Church,” or the “Church of the Latter-day Saints,” the most important thing in those names is the absence of the Savior’s name. To remove the Lord’s name from the Lord’s Church is a major victory for Satan. When we discard the Savior’s name, we are subtly disregarding all that Jesus Christ did for us—even His Atonement.” [1] So,

The Dividing Line of Doctrine

How and Where to Make Divisions... Sometimes, I get asked “Why do you get so up at arms about other religions?” or, “Why do you pick on other religions so much?” I think the following will help you see where I’m coming from, before I spill the beans on such. We have difficulty sometimes in discovering where to make divisions when considering where to spend our money, and who to support, where to make purchases, and where not to do such. We also often have difficulty on how to know if a church or a congregation is a place where someone can actually become saved. Like, how can we know that a Mormon is likely not saved but we can know that a regular church attender at a gospel sound church is likely saved? What is it that would make my church attendance at a specific body no longer appropriate? Both answers to these questions deal with doctrine. If a company is pushing false doctrine using their influence and power to push a heretical doctrine or teaching, this is often when the red fla

Objectivity is the Language of Heaven

NDErs (i. e. people who have claimed to have had a Near Death Experience ) often report that when they go to Heaven, they frequently see and recognize people such as friends and family members. It is often also reported that when they were communicating with friends and relatives, they realized that they weren’t speaking English, but that they were telepathically speaking to one another. It seems it would be impossible to have communication with others without learning every language that has ever existed under the sun, but since heaven is a perfect place, [1] then communication should be perfect as well. In other words, it seems unlikely that there are barriers to communication. So, I should be able to communicate with the Apostles, upon my arrival for instance, but how? I personally only really know how to speak English fluently. My Spanish, Japanese, German, Russian, Chinese, and Latin is like that of a child, and my Greek is only in reading and writing. If communication is me

The Highest Virtue

A virtue is a trait of excellence. What is the highest virtue? It seems that based on the nature of truth, that truth itself is perhaps the highest virtue. For instance, I could say that love is the highest virtue, but then I could ask the question of whether that is true or not. If it is or isn’t true, this places truth virtuously higher than love, at least in some sense. The fact that I can question love through the lens of truth seems to place truth above love in height of virtue. On the other hand, if I said that truth is the highest virtue, then it seems that it would be loving to tell others the truth! Perhaps truth and love go hand in hand, but this also concerns the nature of what truth is. Truth is a requirement for love, which I argue here , but is love a requirement for truth? Love must contain truth in order to be true love. But truth does not have to contain love in order to be true truth. Take for instance, mathematics, or numbers in general… Sometimes, the truth hurts

Self-tests of Some of the World's Religions

It is fairly common for a religion of the world to give itself a sort of test for truth, since this is one question that is asked of any religion: “Why should I believe what you are telling me is true?” After all, the answer to such a question will ultimately result in followers of specific beliefs and doctrines, let alone religions, or will result in a lack of followers. If a religion can answer this question posed by seekers and thinkers, and therefore train its adherents to be able to answer why a religion is true, this will inevitably help people believe in such, even if the claims are false. If there is no answer, this is where a religion will perhaps find more trouble for itself. Many religions make an appeal to a higher authority, namely, God , for the veracity of their existence and as a result, no one can question the truth from such an authority. This is correct in a sense, that if in fact God is making such a claim, then what is said or stated is true , but the question

Who Made God? Identifying Categorical Errors

A category is simply a distinct class to which something belongs… A set of objects that can be treated as equal in some way. A Macintosh apple belongs to the category, apple, and not what we categorize as an orange. Similarly, colors are in a different category than taste. When we say, “apples and oranges” what we mean is that there has been a confusion of categories. Sure, they are both fruit, but when you examine both, there is an obvious difference. An apple is not an orange, and an orange is not an apple. Macintosh, Granny Smith, and red delicious are all apples. Navel, blood, and Valencia are all oranges. To mix the two, for instance, to call a navel orange an apple, would be a categorical error, sometimes referred to as a category mistake. How Identifying Categorical Errors can Help with Apologetics It seems that simply learning about or being reminded of categorical errors can help us be more aware of them. We have all heard or thought of ourselves, the question, “Who mad

The Two Systems: A Confused Definition of Love

A couple years ago I wrote an article called the Jehovah’s Witness training videos . The article was meant to be humorous in a sense, because there are likely not any actual training videos, but it seems that they have all watched them. We can suspect this because they all often have the same points of conversation. When you talk about the Trinity, they will use the Bible like a machine gun and shoot you with verses. The verses are always the same: Colossians 1:15, Mark 10:18… So, there is an implication that they all have the same information. There is one source from where they gather their patterns and behaviors. Similarly, I think we can see the power behind the system of the world as well. We can see what this power is like by the tracks he leaves behind. The contrast of the two systems is really seen in Revelation 14:8. “Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great, she who made all nations drink the wine of the passion of her sexual immorality.” John is using the word Babylon here for

The Evidence and Power of Testimony

What to say to People who Demand more Evidence for God. Why is there something rather than nothing? Glacier National Park. © Nace Howell, 2018. The question is, how much evidence do you require? Would Jesus have to come back and slap you in the face with evidence that He is God? It seems to me that there is a line we must draw. We do this in all other areas of our lives, so why would we treat theism any different? When a court convicts, they do so “beyond a reasonable doubt.” I would like to take a few moments to explore this a bit. But before we get to that, I want to pose a question, which is… why are you the standard? What makes you think He has to prove His existence to everyone individually? He already created the universe from nothing. In the beginning, there was a big bang. Seriously… do you believe your mom when she tells you a story about her day? Did you believe the reports of 9/11 when they were happening? Do you accept the testimony of anything you hear on social

Two Problems Jesus has with the Mormon Doctrine of Eternal Families

Mormonism teaches that those who are married in a temple can be married for eternity. In Doctrine and Covenants 132:15–20, we find the following: 15 Therefore, if a man marry him a wife in the world, and he marry her not by me nor by my word , and he covenant with her so long as he is in the world and she with him, their covenant and marriage are not of force when they are dead , and when they are out of the world; therefore, they are not bound by any law when they are out of the world. 16 Therefore, when they are out of the world they neither marry nor are given in marriage; but are appointed angels in heaven, which angels are ministering servants, to minister for those who are worthy of a far more, and an exceeding, and an eternal weight of glory. 17 For these angels did not abide my law; therefore, they cannot be enlarged, but remain separately and singly, without exaltation, in their saved condition, to all eternity; and from henceforth are not gods, but are angels of God forever

Baptism is Not Necessary for Salvation According to the Early Church

Let’s dive right in. The Bible says in Acts 2:37-41, Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?” And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is for you and for your children and for all who are far off, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself.” And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, “Save yourselves from this crooked generation.” So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls. The phrase in Acts 2:38 that reads, “for the forgiveness of your sins” modifies the word repentance, not the word baptism. See more about this Here . What is interesting is that those who translate the above verse as meaning that baptism is a requirement for salvation ar

Apologetics and Evidence

Search This Blog