Language Changes, But Objective Reality Does Not

“Those are just Semantics… You are just Playing Word Games.” Have you ever been accused of this? Why are they word games? Are we just spewing out sounds from our mouth that have no meaning? At this point, when someone is accused of playing words games, if the accusation were true, they might as well be shouting gibberish (unintelligible or meaningless speech or writing).

When one makes the flippant claim after you try to show him or her the truth through logic, that you are playing word games, or that you are just discussing semantics (“pffft” followed by an eye roll), these actually are words with meaning. More frequently than I would like to admit, I hear the misapplied accusation of “semantics” or “word games” used as an argument in order to dismiss what was said before the accusation. The thing is, when someone says this, you can simply ask him what he means. Often, he will just tell you that you are playing with words. Here is how to show him that he is misunderstanding.

It is very simple

Think of the sounds that come out of our mouths that make up words. The sounds that come out might not have meaning, but what they represent definitely does. For instance, “excuse me” in English, Greek, Italian, French, Japanese and Spanish all basically represent the same idea. How about the word “Orange” (as in the fruit)? Whether you say it in any of the listed languages above, it all points to the same object, which is key to our understanding. The sound that comes out of our mouth to describe an orange will be different in many languages, but it will all point to the same thing. The same object.

Let’s see what Jesus says in Matthew 12:33-37,

“Make a tree good and its fruit will be good, or make a tree bad and its fruit will be bad, for a tree is recognized by its fruit. You brood of vipers, how can you who are evil say anything good? For the mouth speaks what the heart is full of. A good man brings good things out of the good stored up in him, and an evil man brings evil things out of the evil stored up in him. But I tell you that everyone will have to give account on the Day of Judgment for every empty word they have spoken. For by your words you will be acquitted, and by your words you will be condemned.”[1]

How is it that on the Day of Judgment, people will be held accountable for every careless word they have spoken? It is because our words are simply a representation of what we find in reality. Ultimately, there is only one language, which is reality. This is why it is universal, no matter if a person is Chinese, French-Canadian, Pakistani, Punjabi, Mexican, Russian, or literally anything else, that all people will be judged on the Day of Judgment for every empty word he or she has spoken. Language is not relative because objective truth is not relative. Languages do indeed change, but objective reality does not. See this link on a clear explanation on how to understand objective reality with a photographic time stamp.

If words do not have objective meaning, then how can we possibly communicate?

If I am referring to an orange to another English speaker, they believe because they believe that truth is relative, that the word “orange” means “bulldozer,” or even, “peanut,” then there would be quite the confusion in our conversation. The question is, how would anything be accomplished if we lived as if truth were relative in our words? The answer is nothing would be accomplished. This is part of the principle of livability. It might sound like a nice idea to some that words have relative meaning, but life does not work like that. We cannot possibly live our lives in this manner. This is why it is important to know these things so that when we have a discussion with someone that we can show them that our words do matter.

When people are making the argument that logic is just word games, they ultimately believe that it gives strength to their agenda. They try to use the idea of playing word games and semantics to make it like the words I have been using are just hollow, empty, grunts. But like I mentioned, these grunts and sounds, whatever they sound like, represent something in reality.

I think it is interesting to see at this point something that I alluded to earlier, that when someone says that “you are just using word games, etc.” he is saying that his words have meaning, even though words in general do not have meaning. His phrase, "you are just using word games" implies that he believes that what he just said is objectively meaningful.

In other words, his logic looks like this:

1. If you are using logic, then these are just meaningless word games.

2. You are using logic.

3. Therefore, you are using meaningless word games.

What is interesting about this is that when people do this, they are applying logic in order to make a logical argument against using logic, which is ultimately self-defeating. It is like saying, “Words do not matter.” Or even, “Logic is illogical.” Do those words matter? Is that logic illogical?

The problem for our friends is that the truth lies in the object. The truth is not in the sound that comes out of our mouths, but in the object that the sound represents. Truth is claims that conform to reality. This is why we can say of the law of non-contradiction that something cannot be both true and false at the same time and in the same sense. Because what we are saying represents the things that are in actual reality. For instance, if I say, “Jane is pregnant.” That claim cannot be both true and false in the same sense and at the same time.

Similarly, in the law of excluded middle, anytime we make a claim (with our words) that claim is either true or false. It must be one or the other. To use the above example again, the claim “Jane is pregnant” can only be either true or false. There are no other alternatives. True or false is not a false dilemma. Why? Because this claim points to an object. That object in this instance being Jane.

Behold, the power of words:

The Bible teaches us about how and why our words are so important. The reason they are important is because they point to something greater than themselves… that being reality. In the list below, see for yourself that words are not relative, that they do point to something in reality. See for yourself that our words are highly significant:

James 1:26 “Those who consider themselves religious and yet do not keep a tight rein on their tongues deceive themselves, and their religion is worthless.”

James 3:2 “For we all stumble in many ways. And if anyone does not stumble in what he says, he is a perfect man, able also to bridle his whole body” (Continue reading this chapter to see that no one is able to bridle his whole body; see also Romans 3:10-18).

Proverbs 29:20 “Do you see a man who is hasty in his words? There is more hope for a fool than for him.”

Proverbs 10:19 “When words are many, transgression is not lacking, but whoever restrains his lips is prudent” (Be careful with your words, because they do have meaning).

Proverbs 13:3 “Whoever guards his mouth preserves his life; he who opens wide his lips comes to ruin.”

Proverbs 21:23 “Whoever keeps his mouth and his tongue keeps himself out of trouble.”

Ephesians 4:29 “Let no corrupting talk come out of your mouths, but only such as is good for building up, as fits the occasion, that it may give grace to those who hear.”

Colossians 3:17 “And whatever you do, in word or deed, do everything in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through him.”

Psalm 119:105 “Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path.”

Matthew 4:4 “But he answered, “It is written, “‘Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.’”

Ecclesiastes 10:12 “The words of a wise man's mouth win him favor, but the lips of a fool consume him.”

Colossians 3:16 “Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly, teaching and admonishing one another in all wisdom, singing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, with thankfulness in your hearts to God.”

Matthew 24:35 “Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away.”

Isaiah 40:8 “The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God will stand forever.”

2 Timothy 3:16-17 “All Scripture [which are words] is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be competent, equipped for every good work.”

John 17:17 “Sanctify them in the truth; your word is truth.”

If you have ever misused, abused, or confused your words, the Good News is that there is forgiveness. In Romans 3:23, Paul tells us that all fall short of the glory of God. James in the above list tells us that no one is able to bridle their tongue. We are in need of a Savior. We need to be rescued for using our words in an abusive, arbitrary manner. In short, we need to be saved from our moral failures. This is much easier than one might think. John 3:16 teaches us that God so loved the world that He gave His one and only Son that whoever believes in Him shall not die, but will have eternal life. God loves you and He gave you a free gift. Romans 6:23 says, "For the cost of our moral failures is death, but the gift of God is eternal life through Christ Jesus our Lord." Receive this free gift. "Confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, then you will be saved" (Romans 10:9). Receive this free gift today. 2 Corinthians 5:17 says, "If anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. old things have passed away and behold, all things have become new."

Written by Nace Howell through the grace of the Lord Jesus

[1] ESV; emphasis mine.

Comments

How to Show a Mormon the Difference Between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus

I find that Mormons frequently claim that they are Christians, and that they want to be referred to as Christians, and that they have even recently sought to distance themselves from the word “Mormon.” The problem is, they worship another Jesus, and here is how to show them the difference between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus. Before we get to that, some clarifications are necessary. Specifically, that they cannot even distance themselves from being called "Mormons." The Mormon President Russell Nelson said, “What’s in a name or, in this case, a nickname? When it comes to nicknames of the Church, such as the “LDS Church,” the “Mormon Church,” or the “Church of the Latter-day Saints,” the most important thing in those names is the absence of the Savior’s name. To remove the Lord’s name from the Lord’s Church is a major victory for Satan. When we discard the Savior’s name, we are subtly disregarding all that Jesus Christ did for us—even His Atonement.” [1] ...

Objectivity is the Language of Heaven

NDErs (i. e. people who have claimed to have had a Near Death Experience ) often report that when they go to Heaven, they frequently see and recognize people such as friends and family members. It is often also reported that when they were communicating with friends and relatives, they realized that they weren’t speaking English, but that they were telepathically speaking to one another. It seems it would be impossible to have communication with others without learning every language that has ever existed under the sun, but since heaven is a perfect place, [1] then communication should be perfect as well. In other words, it seems unlikely that there are barriers to communication. So, I should be able to communicate with the Apostles, upon my arrival for instance, but how? I personally only really know how to speak English fluently. My Spanish, Japanese, German, Russian, Chinese, and Latin is like that of a child, and my Greek is only in reading and writing. If ...

The Dividing Line of Doctrine

How and Where to Make Divisions... Sometimes, I get asked “Why do you get so up at arms about other religions?” or, “Why do you pick on other religions so much?” I think the following will help you see where I’m coming from, before I spill the beans on such. We have difficulty sometimes in discovering where to make divisions when considering where to spend our money, and who to support, where to make purchases, and where not to do such. We also often have difficulty on how to know if a church or a congregation is a place where someone can actually become saved. Like, how can we know that a Mormon is likely not saved but we can know that a regular church attender at a gospel sound church is likely saved? What is it that would make my church attendance at a specific body no longer appropriate? Both answers to these questions deal with doctrine. If a company is pushing false doctrine using their influence and power to push a heretical doctrine or teaching, this is often when the red...

The Highest Virtue

A virtue is a trait of excellence. What is the highest virtue? It seems that based on the nature of truth, that truth itself is perhaps the highest virtue. For instance, I could say that love is the highest virtue, but then I could ask the question of whether that is true or not. If it is or isn’t true, this places truth virtuously higher than love, at least in some sense. The fact that I can question love through the lens of truth seems to place truth above love in height of virtue. On the other hand, if I said that truth is the highest virtue, then it seems that it would be loving to tell others the truth! Perhaps truth and love go hand in hand, but this also concerns the nature of what truth is. Truth is a requirement for love, which I argue here , but is love a requirement for truth? Love must contain truth in order to be true love. But truth does not have to contain love in order to be true truth. Take for instance, mathematics, or numbers in general… Sometimes, t...

Self-tests of Some of the World's Religions

It is fairly common for a religion of the world to give itself a sort of test for truth, since this is one question that is asked of any religion: “Why should I believe what you are telling me is true?” After all, the answer to such a question will ultimately result in followers of specific beliefs and doctrines, let alone religions, or will result in a lack of followers. If a religion can answer this question posed by seekers and thinkers, and therefore train its adherents to be able to answer why a religion is true, this will inevitably help people believe in such, even if the claims are false. If there is no answer, this is where a religion will perhaps find more trouble for itself. Many religions make an appeal to a higher authority, namely, God , for the veracity of their existence and as a result, no one can question the truth from such an authority. This is correct in a sense, that if in fact God is making such a claim, then what is said or stated is true ...

Who Made God? Identifying Categorical Errors

A category is simply a distinct class to which something belongs… A set of objects that can be treated as equal in some way. A Macintosh apple belongs to the category, apple, and not what we categorize as an orange. Similarly, colors are in a different category than taste. When we say, “apples and oranges” what we mean is that there has been a confusion of categories. Sure, they are both fruit, but when you examine both, there is an obvious difference. An apple is not an orange, and an orange is not an apple. Macintosh, Granny Smith, and red delicious are all apples. Navel, blood, and Valencia are all oranges. To mix the two, for instance, to call a navel orange an apple, would be a categorical error, sometimes referred to as a category mistake. How Identifying Categorical Errors can Help with Apologetics It seems that simply learning about or being reminded of categorical errors can help us be more aware of them. We have all heard or thought of ourselves, the...

The Evidence and Power of Testimony

What to say to People who Demand more Evidence for God. Why is there something rather than nothing? Glacier National Park. © Nace Howell, 2018. The question is, how much evidence do you require? Would Jesus have to come back and slap you in the face with evidence that He is God? It seems to me that there is a line we must draw. We do this in all other areas of our lives, so why would we treat theism any different? When a court convicts, they do so “beyond a reasonable doubt.” I would like to take a few moments to explore this a bit. But before we get to that, I want to pose a question, which is… why are you the standard? What makes you think He has to prove His existence to everyone individually? He already created the universe from nothing. In the beginning, there was a big bang. Seriously… do you believe your mom when she tells you a story about her day? Did you believe the reports of 9/11 when they were happening? Do you accept the testimony of anything you hear on social ...

The Two Systems: A Confused Definition of Love

A couple years ago I wrote an article called the Jehovah’s Witness training videos . The article was meant to be humorous in a sense, because there are likely not any actual training videos, but it seems that they have all watched them. We can suspect this because they all often have the same points of conversation. When you talk about the Trinity, they will use the Bible like a machine gun and shoot you with verses. The verses are always the same: Colossians 1:15, Mark 10:18… So, there is an implication that they all have the same information. There is one source from where they gather their patterns and behaviors. Similarly, I think we can see the power behind the system of the world as well. We can see what this power is like by the tracks he leaves behind. The contrast of the two systems is really seen in Revelation 14:8. “Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great, she who made all nations drink the wine of the passion of her sexual immorality.” John is using the word Bab...

Two Problems Jesus has with the Mormon Doctrine of Eternal Families

Mormonism teaches that those who are married in a temple can be married for eternity. In Doctrine and Covenants 132:15–20, we find the following: 15 Therefore, if a man marry him a wife in the world, and he marry her not by me nor by my word , and he covenant with her so long as he is in the world and she with him, their covenant and marriage are not of force when they are dead , and when they are out of the world; therefore, they are not bound by any law when they are out of the world. 16 Therefore, when they are out of the world they neither marry nor are given in marriage; but are appointed angels in heaven, which angels are ministering servants, to minister for those who are worthy of a far more, and an exceeding, and an eternal weight of glory. 17 For these angels did not abide my law; therefore, they cannot be enlarged, but remain separately and singly, without exaltation, in their saved condition, to all eternity; and from henceforth are not gods, but are angels of God for...

Baptism is Not Necessary for Salvation According to the Early Church

Let’s dive right in. The Bible says in Acts 2:37-41, Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?” And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is for you and for your children and for all who are far off, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself.” And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, “Save yourselves from this crooked generation.” So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls. The phrase in Acts 2:38 that reads, “for the forgiveness of your sins” modifies the word repentance, not the word baptism. See more about this Here . What is interesting is that those who translate the above verse as meaning that baptism is a requ...

Apologetics and Evidence

Search This Blog