Skip to main content

Three Barriers to the Gospel

When one considers the issues of post-modernism, such as the idea that everyone has their own truth, the question becomes, how do we answer someone who is adamantly standing on such ground? What will change their mind about the truth of the gospel if everyone has his or her own truth? 

It seems that the first thing we should know is how to combat post-modernism with the Three Fundamental Laws of Logic. The most significant of the three laws in combatting post-modernism is the Law of non-contradiction. The idea is that any truth statement or claim is made, such as, “Jesus rose from the dead,” or “Jennifer is pregnant” or “it is morally correct to transition genders if one feels it is necessary,” then the fact of the matter is that not one of these truth claims can be both true and false at the same time and in the same sense. 

To use the third fundamental law of logic, called the Law of the excluded middle, which would be to say that all of these truth claims are either true or false. Either “Jesus rose from the dead,” or He did not, either “Jennifer is pregnant,” or she is not, and “it is morally correct to transition genders if one feels it is necessary,” or it is not. These examples show us that the law of excluded middle is not a false dilemma. There are no other alternatives. 

I predict that the following system of thought after post-modernity is simply going to be apathy and complacency. If there is no truth, according to a post-modernist, then why should we care about anything at all? Post-modernists believe that everyone has their own truth, and if this is the case, then this means that nothing is true. Simply stated, if everything is true, then nothing is true. 

The above subject material is more deeply discussed in the links within the text above. This article seeks to continue the discussion on post-modernists following the combatting of the post-modern mind with the three fundamental laws of logic (above). So, where do we go after the discussion of post-modernism? 

Now, if a person who holds to post-modernism for instance, says that that he doesn’t believe that transitioning genders is not immoral no matter what these laws teach, that he just does not care what the laws state, then where do we go in our conversation? Similarly, when we are witnessing to people about Jesus and they tell us that they don’t care if they are in need of salvation, then how do we navigate this?

We come to the three barriers to belief in God and ultimately, the gospel: Emotional, Intellectual, and Volitional.

 


Emotional Barrier

The emotional barrier is often the first line of defense against seeing the truth of Christianity. It rears its ugly head when the person you are speaking with thinks that God could not possibly exist because of all the evil in the world. It often becomes very personal with him. He might say, “If God exists, then why did my parent/child/spouse/friend die?” 

The problem is that this kind of thinking is logically fallacious. Just because we don’t like the fact that something is true, doesn’t mean that it is not true. Just because there is evil in the world does not mean that God does not exist. This is not a false dilemma, that either God exists or evil exists. If God created people with their own free will, then the possibility of evil must exist, otherwise people would not be truly free. 

Another way a person might have an emotional barrier up is that they are mad at God for something that He allowed to happen to him, so they do not want to acknowledge His existence. In either case, if someone is mad at God or if they don’t believe in Him because evil happened, does not mean that God does not exist, and the gospel isn’t true. 

So, the idea is that we want to show our friends and family the existence of the emotional barrier in their lives, because recognizing it with them may help them to see that they really do not have any ground to stand on based on having such a barrier to the gospel. 

 

Intellectual Barrier

The intellectual barrier is the belief that God cannot exist, or that for instance, the universe has existed forever. This barrier is the atheists’ claim to fame. He believes that God cannot possibly exist, and if you do find an atheist that believe that He possibly exists, for him it will obviously be more unlikely than not. But again, the same idea is used for this barrier as the last. We show a person with an intellectual barrier that they do not have anything to stand on, because some of the arguments for the existence of God are irrefutable. For instance, William Lane Craig champions the Kalam Cosmological Argument, which looks like this: 

 

1.     Everything that begins to exist has a cause for its existence.

2.     The Universe began to exist.

3.     Therefore, the Universe had a cause (and that cause is what we call “God”).

 

If a person were to argue against either of these premises (1. or 2.) it seems he would have a lot of work to do for no gained headway. If someone were to say that not everything that begins to exist has a cause for its existence, you might simply ask them to prove it. Perhaps they might bring up quantum physics, but the thing we find quantum physics in already exists (i. e. in the universe), so that does not work. Fluctuations are not nothing, which are the causes of some quantum events coming into existence. Therefore, there is something that causes the existence of quantum events, even at the quantum level. Just because quantum physics are different than what we see does not mean that these quantum events are caused by nothing.[1]

In any event, everything we have witnessed with our eyeballs coming into existence has had a cause, and to believe otherwise is like believing in cheap magic tricks. So, again, ask them to produce something that does not have a cause for its existence. They will not be able to do such. 

Second, people will attack the idea that the universe had a beginning (2.). But this is what the standard model maintains. Other cosmological models of the universe will be used in defense of the universe existing for an infinite regress, but all of these models fail in some way or another. This is why the standard model, or the big-bang model is generally accepted by most scholars, which is why it is called the standard model. The reason that many are so confident in big bang cosmology is because we have strong evidence for it. The red shift is essentially the doppler effect in the light spectrum, and we see the red shift at the distant parts of the universe as viewed through high power telescopes. This red shift simply means that light is traveling away from our point of view, which tells cosmologists that the universe is expanding. The idea behind this is that if we were to go back in time, the universe would shrink to a point of nonexistence. Thus, at the beginning, we have the actual big-bang.[2]

If these two premises are true, then the conclusion is true. Now this does not necessarily lead to the Christian God, but it definitely leads to the God of all that exists, and we can help someone believe that Jesus is this God through what we will discuss below.

 

Volitional Barrier

The volitional barrier to the belief in God and the gospel of Jesus concerns the barrier of the will. In other words, a person sometimes simply does not want God to exist because he or she will have to answer to Him. If God existed, it would only create problems for him in his mind. If the existence of God were true, then that means that he would have to answer to someone else for his actions and all those women he took advantage of, or all the money he stole, or all those times he took the name of God in vain. This is why people do not want Jesus to be the truth. They want to be their own gods. They want to be condoned in any action they choose or feel good doing, but yet again, just because we want something to be true, does not mean that it is or will be. We can want something so deeply to be true, but it does not mean that it is. I can believe with all my heart that it is going to snow, that I will win the lottery, or that I will become a famous artist, or whatever, but that does not make my belief true. Similarly, we can show that if we have broken down these earlier barriers and come to the volitional barrier, we can show them that they ultimately do not want to believe the gospel because they do not want it to be true. 

The way to lead someone out of the volitional barrier is perhaps strictly a spiritual battle, but showing them that they do not have emotional or intellectual barriers to stand on may help them see and understand that it is only a desire that they do not want there to be a God, and not anything that necessarily points to the truth.

The question we ask someone at this point is, if we could “absolutely prove that Christianity is true, would you become a Christian?” Similarly, if we could ask that if we could “absolutely prove that it was immoral that transitioning gender is true, would you still transition?” If the answer to the first is no, and the second is yes, then we have come to know the person’s heart on the matter. We have come to see the volitional barrier square in the face.

 

Final Steps

If we succeed in our discussion with the three barriers, then we move to show that the gospel is true, and to start this, we show people that the Bible is true and is the word of God. The children’s game of telephone as an argument against the integrity of the Bible does not hold, because historically speaking, it would be impossible, as we see in this link

From here, we show that because what the Bible says is true, then what it says about Jesus must be true. In John 1:1-3, the Bible says, “In the beginning was the word (Jesus) and the word (Jesus) was with God and the word (Jesus) was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through Him all things were made, and without Him nothing was made that has been made.” 

What this says is that Jesus made everything. Jesus is the creator of the universe. “Through Him all things were made and without Him, nothing was made that has been made.” This means that if Jesus was ever a created being, then He created Himself, which is an absurd notion. No, Jesus was not created because He is the creator. 

This is what we can tell people we have scaled the three barriers to the gospel, that Jesus is God, that He loves them so much that He died in their place, and that means that they will not come under the wrath of God, but also that this means that they will have eternal life. Not only does a Christian not come under the wrath of God, but he or she lives for eternity! 

The Roman Road is simple, but solid. This is something that you can easily share with people in order to lead them to Christ. I like to use 4 verses, because they are easier to remember, and it seems to take out further complicated thoughts. Romans 3:23 says that we all fall short of the glory of God. This means that we do not meet the standard that God is. He is the standard of goodness, and we fail to meet Him as the standard in our goodness. The proof for this comes from an honest analysis of the Ten Commandments, but all you need to look at is one of them. Think about the Seventh Commandment for example, that “You shall not commit adultery.” Jesus clarifies this commandment in the sermon on the mount in Matthew chapter 5. He says that “if you have looked on a woman with lust in your heart, you have already committed adultery with her.” I think that not only does this show how disastrously far we are from the standard of goodness that is God, but I think that through it, Jesus is saying, “See how desperately you need me.” We fall short of God’s glory.

Second, in the Roman Road, we turn to Romans 6:23, which says “For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life through Christ Jesus our Lord.” This is to say that the cost of our sin (our moral failures against God), is the reason why we die. The death rate is 1/1. Ten out of ten people, die. The reason why we die is because we have sinned. But this is not the end of the verse. Paul says, “but the gift of God is eternal life through Christ Jesus our Lord.” In other words, death is a temporary setback to our existence. We will live for eternity.

Third, in Romans 5:8, we read that “God demonstrates His own love for us in this: that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.” So, in the middle of the act of our sin, He did the biggest act of love that anyone could ever possibly do: He died for us. He took our place on the cross. This shows us that God loves us. 

Similarly, John 3:16 says that “God so loved the world that He gave His one and only Son that whoever believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life.” God loves you so much that He Himself became a man in the body of Jesus Christ and came to earth to die for our sins.[3] This is essential for a person to understand that God loves Him or her. It is essential because he or she can have a personal relationship with Him, which is what He wants. He communicated to us in human language, the words of the Bible. The historical events that actually took place in the Bible are written down so that all may learn about Him and know Him.

God loves us unconditionally, but there are conditions to salvation. The condition is found in our final verse in the Roman Road: Romans 10:9. It reads, “If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, then you will be saved.” Confess with your physical mouth that Jesus is Lord, because professing your faith and sharing your faith is important to faith.

Believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, because Christianity is based on a historical fact.[4] Then you will be saved. This verse, Romans 10:9, is a Modus Ponens syllogism. What that means is that it is essentially an if, then argument. IF you confess and believe, THEN you will be saved. This is the condition for salvation, which is not much of condition at all. “It is by grace we are saved through faith, and this is not from ourselves, but it is the gift of God, not by works, so that no one may boast.”[5] We cannot earn a gift, any more than we can earn forgiveness. 

Remember that when you are trying to share the gospel that the gift of salvation if for everyone to receive, but only some will take the free gift. Don’t beat yourself up about what you could have, should have, or would have said, because ultimately it is not you who works on the heart of a person, but this is the work of the Spirit (see John 16:8) In any event, there is no question that He will use you to bring someone into the Kingdom of God (see Romans 10:14-15). 

 

 © Nace Howell, 2022


[1] https://youtu.be/53M8ElQA1Go?t=150

[2] See Genesis 1:1.

[3] See John 1:14.

[4] 1 Corinthians 15 Paul says that if there is no Resurrection, then Christianity is false. Everything in Christianity hangs on the Resurrection. 

[5] Ephesians 2:8-9.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Show a Mormon the Difference Between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus

I find that Mormons frequently claim that they are Christians, and that they want to be referred to as Christians, and that they have even recently sought to distance themselves from the word “Mormon.” The problem is, they worship another Jesus, and here is how to show them the difference between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus. Before we get to that, some clarifications are necessary. Specifically, that they cannot even distance themselves from being called "Mormons."   The Mormon President Russell Nelson said,    “What’s in a name or, in this case, a nickname? When it comes to nicknames of the Church, such as the “LDS Church,” the “Mormon Church,” or the “Church of the Latter-day Saints,” the most important thing in those names is the absence of the Savior’s name. To remove the Lord’s name from the Lord’s Church is a major victory for Satan. When we discard the Savior’s name, we are subtly disregarding all that Jesus Christ did for us—even His Atonement.” [1] ...

Objectivity is the Language of Heaven

NDErs (i. e. people who have claimed to have had a   Near Death Experience ) often report that when they go to Heaven, they frequently see and recognize people such as friends and family members. It is often also reported that when they were communicating with friends and relatives, they realized that they weren’t speaking English, but that they were telepathically speaking to one another.   It seems it would be impossible to have communication with others without learning every language that has ever existed under the sun, but since heaven is a perfect place, [1]  then communication should be perfect as well. In other words, it seems unlikely that there are barriers to communication. So, I should be able to communicate with the Apostles, upon my arrival for instance, but how? I personally only really know how to speak English fluently. My Spanish, Japanese, German, Russian, Chinese, and Latin is like that of a child, and my Greek is only in reading and writing.  If ...

The Dividing Line of Doctrine

How and Where to Make Divisions... Sometimes, I get asked “Why do you get so up at arms about other religions?” or, “Why do you pick on other religions so much?” I think the following will help you see where I’m coming from, before I spill the beans on such.   We have difficulty sometimes in discovering where to make divisions when considering where to spend our money, and who to support, where to make purchases, and where not to do such. We also often have difficulty on how to know if a church or a congregation is a place where someone can actually become saved. Like, how can we know that a Mormon is likely not saved but we can know that a regular church attender at a gospel sound church is likely saved? What is it that would make my church attendance at a specific body no longer appropriate? Both answers to these questions deal with doctrine. If a company is pushing false doctrine using their influence and power to push a heretical doctrine or teaching, this is often when the red...

The Highest Virtue

A virtue is a trait of excellence. What is the highest virtue? It seems that based on the nature of truth, that truth itself is perhaps the highest virtue. For instance, I could say that love is the highest virtue, but then I could ask the question of whether that is true or not. If it is or isn’t true, this places truth virtuously higher than love, at least in some sense. The fact that I can question love through the lens of truth seems to place truth above love in height of virtue. On the other hand, if I said that truth is the highest virtue, then it seems that it would be loving to tell others the truth! Perhaps truth and love go hand in hand, but this also concerns the nature of what truth is.  Truth is a requirement for love, which I argue here , but is love a requirement for truth? Love must contain truth in order to be  true  love. But truth does not have to contain love in order to be true truth. Take for instance, mathematics, or numbers in general… Sometimes, t...

Self-tests of Some of the World's Religions

It is fairly common for a religion of the world to give itself a sort of test for truth, since this is one question that is asked of any religion: “Why should I believe what you are telling me is true?” After all, the answer to such a question will ultimately result in followers of specific beliefs and doctrines, let alone religions, or will result in a lack of followers.  If a religion can answer this question posed by seekers and thinkers, and therefore train its adherents to be able to answer why a religion is true, this will inevitably help people believe in such, even if the claims are false. If there is no answer, this is where a religion will perhaps find more trouble for itself.  Many religions make an appeal to a higher authority, namely,  God , for the veracity of their existence and as a result, no one can question the truth from such an authority. This is correct in a sense, that  if in fact God is making such a claim, then what is said or stated is true ...

Who Made God? Identifying Categorical Errors

A category is simply a distinct class to which something belongs… A set of objects that can be treated as equal in some way. A Macintosh apple belongs to the category, apple, and not what we categorize as an orange. Similarly, colors are in a different category than taste.   When we say, “apples and oranges” what we mean is that there has been a confusion of categories. Sure, they are both fruit, but when you examine both, there is an obvious difference. An apple is not an orange, and an orange is not an apple. Macintosh, Granny Smith, and red delicious are all apples. Navel, blood, and Valencia are all oranges. To mix the two, for instance, to call a navel orange an apple, would be a categorical error, sometimes referred to as a category mistake.      How Identifying Categorical Errors can Help with Apologetics It seems that simply learning about or being reminded of categorical errors can help us be more aware of them. We have all heard or thought of ourselves, the...

The Evidence and Power of Testimony

What to say to People who Demand more Evidence for God. Why is there something rather than nothing? Glacier National Park. © Nace Howell, 2018. The question is, how much evidence do you require? Would Jesus have to come back and slap you in the face with evidence that He is God? It seems to me that there is a line we must draw. We do this in all other areas of our lives, so why would we treat theism any different? When a court convicts, they do so “beyond a reasonable doubt.” I would like to take a few moments to explore this a bit. But before we get to that, I want to pose a question, which is… why are you the standard? What makes you think He has to prove His existence to everyone individually? He already created the universe from nothing. In the beginning, there was a big bang. Seriously… do you believe your mom when she tells you a story about her day? Did you believe the reports of 9/11 when they were happening? Do you accept the testimony of anything you hear on social ...

The Two Systems: A Confused Definition of Love

A couple years ago I wrote an article called  the Jehovah’s Witness training videos . The article was meant to be humorous in a sense, because there are likely not any actual training videos, but it seems that they have all watched them. We can suspect this because they all often have the same points of conversation. When you talk about the Trinity, they will use the Bible like a machine gun and shoot you with verses. The verses are always the same: Colossians 1:15, Mark 10:18… So, there is an implication that they all have the same information. There is one source from where they gather their patterns and behaviors. Similarly, I think we can see the power behind the system of the world as well. We can see what this power is like by the tracks he leaves behind. The contrast of the two systems is really seen in Revelation 14:8. “Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great, she who made all nations drink the wine of the passion of her sexual immorality.” John is using the word  Bab...

Two Problems Jesus has with the Mormon Doctrine of Eternal Families

Mormonism teaches that those who are married in a temple can be married for eternity. In Doctrine and Covenants 132:15–20, we find the following:   15 Therefore, if a man marry him a wife in the world, and he marry her not by me nor by my word , and he covenant with her so long as he is in the world and she with him, their covenant and marriage are not of force when they are dead , and when they are out of the world; therefore, they are not bound by any law when they are out of the world. 16 Therefore, when they are out of the world they neither marry nor are given in marriage; but are appointed angels in heaven, which angels are ministering servants, to minister for those who are worthy of a far more, and an exceeding, and an eternal weight of glory. 17 For these angels did not abide my law; therefore, they cannot be enlarged, but remain separately and singly, without exaltation, in their saved condition, to all eternity; and from henceforth are not gods, but are angels of God for...

Baptism is Not Necessary for Salvation According to the Early Church

Let’s dive right in. The Bible says in Acts 2:37-41,    Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?” And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is for you and for your children and for all who are far off, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself.” And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, “Save yourselves from this crooked generation.” So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls.   The phrase in Acts 2:38 that reads, “for the forgiveness of your sins” modifies the word repentance, not the word baptism.  See more about this Here .   What is interesting is that those who translate the above verse as meaning that baptism is a requ...