Skip to main content

A Look Into Human Existence at the Event of Death

Image
By

This conversation seems like it should begin with a discussion on the soul. A disembodied soul is the description for what happens when a person dies and is simply without a physical human body. This state of existence will be the case until the event of the Resurrection of the saints. 

In both Cartesian dualism and anthropological hylomorphism schools of thought, the disembodied state of the soul takes place. When we die, our souls leave our bodies. Dualism is the idea that the soul and the body are separate things, and the hylomorphic idea is that a soul and a body are not separate things, but a unity. As in, your soul could not fit into the body of another person. Your soul is essentially custom fit to your body. 

What makes this interesting is that there are things that neither school of thought can answer very well, but there are questions that both answer very well. For one, there is a big question concerning dualism, which is about the Resurrection of the dead. For instance, Dualism historically has taught that the fleshly body is like a prison that when the body dies, it is freed from this prison, and this idea has not really been extinguished from Plato to Descartes. One might say that it is, but I still find that even Cartesian dualism still seems to hold to the idea that human existence essentially consists of a soul. Some dualistic arguments are the following:

 

Modal Argument for the Soul:

1.     I am possibly disembodied (I could survive without my brain or body) 

 

[I can logically conceive that I am disembodied. I cannot logically conceive that I am a square circle.]

 

2.     My brain or body are not possibly disembodied (they could not survive without being physical)

3.     So, I am not my brain or body. 

4.     I am either a soul, a brain or a body, so I am a soul.[1]

 

Sameness of the Self Over Time (What I like to think of as the Ship of Theseus argument):

 

1.     If something is a physical object composed of parts, it does not survive over time as the same object if it comes to have different parts.

2.     My body and my brain are physical objects composed of parts.

3.     Therefore, my body and brain do not survive over time as the same objects if they come to have different parts.

4.     My body and brain are constantly coming to have different parts. 

5.     Therefore, my body and brain do not survive over time as the same objects.

6.     I do survive over time as the same object.

7.     Therefore, I am not my body or my brain.

8.     I am either a soul, a body or a brain.

9.     Therefore, I am a soul.[2]

 

I personally love these arguments. I find them to be powerful, beneficial, and life-changing arguments, but they still do not answer one problem as alluded to above. This problem is that cartesian dualism does not answer the question of the Resurrection. For instance, if I am but a soul, then why is there a bodilyResurrection? Why does there need to be a Resurrection, such as discussed in 1 Corinthians 15, 1 Thessalonians 4, and Revelation 20? 

On the other hand, the anthropological hylomorphic idea of the soul does not answer why there is a disembodied state. Anthropological hylomorphism emphasizes the relationship or the unity between the soul and the body. So, the fact that there is a disembodied state (an absence of the body) shows that there is something that seems to not be satisfactorily answered. In Cartesian dualism, a disembodied state of being makes sense, but not so much within the hylomorphic idea of the soul. In Cartesian dualism, the disembodied state is appropriate, but the bodily Resurrection of the saints itself seems to create a problem for Cartesian dualism. In either case, there seems to be an unsatisfying answer. But, taking both into consideration, it seems like we can use each of them to fill in the others’ gaps. Perhaps there are gaps to begin with because we do not have all the information that we need to make a completely satisfying argument concerning the soul and body. 

 

 

Near Death Experiences

 

Systematic Theology is the type of theology that uses every source possible to discover truths about God. To give you something to compare it to, Biblical Theology only uses the Bible. But we have other things apart from the Bible that can tell us truths about God, such as natural theology. For instance, the Kalam Cosmological argument is not found anywhere in the Bible, but it definitely tells us something about God. 

It seems possible, based on the same principle, to use things that agree with the Bible but are not necessarily part of the Bible in order to discover things about the soul, heaven, and hell. Similarly, with what happens to the soul and the nature of the soul. I say this because I must bring up NDE’s (Near Death Experiences). I was once very skeptical about them and dismissed them through what I refer to as, “Black Cat Theology” (from living in the mountains all my life and hearing some of the strange things that people believe). But after researching it from several sources, including interviewing people who have claimed to have had NDE’s, I have changed my mind about the truth of them. In fact, so much so, that I think they should be emphasized in systematic theologies as arguments for the soul and the afterlife.

The reason I was skeptical about them was because of how I understood the Resurrection of the saints. I did not believe that anyone could be resurrected before the Resurrection that will take place for the Day of Judgment, because the Resurrection has not happened yet. So therefore, in my mind, an NDE would go against what the Bible was teaching. I saw NDEs as a cult like belief and dismissed it as such and distanced myself from them. This all changed when I attended the ETS/EPS annual meeting in 2018, while I was sitting under Gary Habermas who further convinced me of the truth of NDE’s… Before Habermas started speaking, I sat down by a gentleman and whispered to him that NDE’s cannot be real, because the Resurrection hasn’t happened yet, and this would go against what the Bible says. He said that Lazarus died and rose from the dead. I was thinking… “well, now I’m ruined.” I listened intently to what Habermas was saying, and slowly, the gears started turning and I became more and more convinced. 

Following this event a few days later, I attended the Reasonable Faith in an Uncertain World event, and one of my favorite Philosophers, J. P. Moreland, was speaking about NDE’s as well and mentioned some further truths about specific NDE’s. I was hooked. From there, I read numerous books on the subject from all kinds of people, some were agnostic and some were Christian. One of the things that J. P Moreland told us, I believe is crucial in studying NDE’s, which is that the person who is having the NDE does not always know how to interpret the NDE. So, some NDE’s, because they are wild and/or confusing, we should maybe not pay as much attention to. It seems that from NDE’s, the major things we should be concerned with are patterns that are recognizable, and also, the evidences beyond a reasonable doubt concerning the testimonies of NDE’s. What I mean by that is when someone claims to have an NDE, often they can give great details about something that it would be impossible for them to know. For instance, when the person’s body is not conscious, and they are being wheeled into the hospital room to be worked on, they give vivid details about what was said by the doctors and nurses because they were floating above their own body and listening to what was being said by the medical team. They also often give detail about how the doctors and nurses performed on their bodies in order to revive them. 

These kinds of descriptions have been classified as OBE’s (Out of Body Experiences), and it seems to me that the main difference is that an OBE is when a person does not travel in the spiritual world to another place (NDE), but just hangs around outside his or her own physical body. With this in mind, I agree with Moreland when he explains that an NDE is basically a misnomer, and should be called a DE (for death experience). 

An interesting NDE that I remember reading about was where a person has left his body and travels through space to go essentially go beyond space and time, and he said that people often describe this thing that one goes through as a tunnel, but he noticed that as he looked around while traveling very fast through space, that it was not a tunnel, but he was simply going so fast that it felt like a tunnel. He said that he looked to the side and saw the beautiful star constellations and wanted to go see them. When he arrived at the end of the tunnel, he described what most people seem to describe, which is a place that is indescribably beautiful, and that it was not yet his time to be there, or sometimes, people are often given a choice if they want to go back because they mention that someone still needs them on earth. 

These are some of the things we can read about in NDE reports, in which we definitely find patterns. Jeffrey Long, a medical doctor, wrote about NDE’s in a book titled, Evidence of the Afterlife: The science of near-death experiences. His aim was to trace the patterns in NDE’s and he came up with several. One of them was a life review. This agrees with what the Bible teaches in Matthew 12:36-37. 

There are several more patterns which Long observed in the thousands of responses that he received. Some things that people will commonly describe in NDE’s are heightened senses, passing in or through a tunnel, experiencing a life review as mentioned, encountering a brilliant light, encountering other being or relatives or friends, learning special knowledge, and several others.[3] Many of these patterns even seem to be common knowledge. We have all seen movies where someone enters a tunnel with bright light at the end of it. The interesting part of all this is that in NDE reports, there are patterns that are recognized. What is also noteworthy is that none of the people who participated in the studies were paid to give their testimonies. They had nothing to gain and nothing to lose, other than people thinking that they were silly or crazy. In any case, many NDE’s are quite fascinating, and they are becoming more well-known because they are happening more frequently. One reason this is happening more often is because of the advancement of medical technology. When someone’s heart stops, we have the tools to re-start a beating heart. 

 

 

Heaven

 

I have studied NDE accounts where when the person arrived to what we could call paradise, which is an ancient Persian word meaning basically the same thing that we would describe in English as a park, it is often the case that brilliant colors are described, and people are greeted by friends and family they love and sometimes even Jesus. I have read NDE accounts where the person described seeing people working, almost in a gardening sense, and there was even mention of something like a wheelbarrow filled with flowers and such. This is intriguing because God created man and placed him in a garden to take care of it.[4]

There are several things I find interesting at this point in the discussion. Paradise, which is what Jesus calls the place where the thief on the cross would soon be with Him, seems to me to be what we think of when we say the word, “heaven.” But what is significant here is that when Jesus was Resurrected, what did He tell Mary when He saw her at the tomb where He was buried? 

 

He asked her, ‘Woman, why are you crying? Who is it you are looking for?’

Thinking he was the gardener, she said, ‘Sir, if you have carried him away, tell me where you have put him, and I will get him.’

Jesus said to her, ‘Mary.’

She turned toward him and cried out in Aramaic, ‘Rabboni!’ (which means ‘Teacher’).

Jesus said, ‘Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father. Go instead to my brothers and tell them, ‘I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.’[5]

 

He told her that He “has not yet ascended to the Father.” So, the question is, what or where exactly is paradise, and how is the Father is not there, but Jesus was? I think Jesus clues us into something in some of His parables and teaching. In speaking with His Disciples, He says, 

 

Do not let your hearts be troubled. You believe in God; believe also in me. My Father’s house has many rooms; if that were not so, would I have told you that I am going there to prepare a place for you? And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come back and take you to be with me that you also may be where I am.[6]

 

So, Jesus died, went to Paradise, was not yet with the Father, then ascended to the Father. He tells us that the Father has many rooms in His house. Perhaps Paradise is a separate place than is the Throneroom of God. Yet, Jesus can go from one to the next. Perhaps He was not able to go to the Father when He was in Paradise with the thief on the cross because He was held up by people worshiping Him and simply wanting to talk with Him after the most amazing, heavenly, church service in the history of all existence. But it still seems like there is an ability to travel from one “room” to the next in the heavenly realms. 

John describes the gates of heaven in the New Jerusalem as never being shut.[7] I find that one of the seven I AM statements of Jesus may also provide some light on the subject:

 

Therefore Jesus said again, “Very truly I tell you, I AM the gate for the sheep. All who have come before me are thieves and robbers, but the sheep have not listened to them. I AM the gate; whoever enters through me will be saved. They will come in and go out, and find pasture. The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full.[8]

 

The idea that the New Jerusalem will have a gate that will never be shut and the way that Jesus talks about being the gate through whom people come in and go out and find pasture, seems to describe the way that “Heaven” will be. I put that in quotes because in our minds we often limit heaven to being the same thing and nothing more than paradise, but as we have seen, the Bible describes a much bigger place than what we have been thinking. 

In any event, it seems that when a person dies, they have “a room” prepared for them by Jesus, and they live in Paradise, in a disembodied state, where it appears that there will be no sleep, and it will always be daytime: 

 

And the city has no need of sun or moon to shine on it, for the glory of God gives it light, and its lamp is the Lamb. By its light will the nations walk, and the kings of the earth will bring their glory into it, and its gates will never be shut by day—and there will be no night there.[9]

 

There will be no need for sleep because there are no physical bodies, except perhaps Jesus when He is in Paradise, but even then, Paul describes our resurrected bodies as very different from our current physical bodies (See 2 Corinthians 5). 


The absence of the physical body can definitely bring many benefits it seems. For instance, if someone has a lower mental capacity such as through genetics or trauma, the way that Cartesian dualism really helped me understand some things is that the soul in a sense, possess the physical body. I generally teach that the human brain is like a guitar, that when all strings are in tune and all strings are present, then the soul is able to operate the body well and use the brain as the instrument to think in the physical world. The problem is that when the human brain is damaged at whatever capacity, then the soul is limited in what it can do through the human brain. Not all the strings are in tune, so to speak, yet songs can still be played. I often ask my audience if a song can be played on a guitar with one string that is out of tune. Most everyone affirms that it can, and they are correct. I could easily belt out “Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star” on a one string guitar that is out of tune. But, on the other hand, I wouldn’t be able to play, say, “Peter and the Wolf” by Sergei Prokofiev. So, I would be limited, but still be able to function, because my soul is able to operate that which it possesses. When my soul leaves my body, then I am free to think accurately in a non-physical world, the same way that NDEr’s describe the way that they were able to think so clearly in their Near-Death Experiences. Many were mesmerized at how well they could think, and when they got back into their bodies, they were unfortunately hindered in their thinking the same as they were before. Similarly, with those who were blind and had NDE’s who left their bodies were also hindered from sight the same way when they entered back into their bodies after the NDE, but could “see” in a disembodied state when there were no physical eyes which are necessary to see in a physical world.

This is all definitely in line with what the Bible teaches in Genesis 2:7, “…then the Lord God formed the man of dust from the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living creature.” This makes good sense because God made the physical components of the earth come alive in the form of a man. Cartesian dualism and anthropological hylomorphism both agree with this. God took the physical components, namely carbon, and inserted His breath into what He created. Thus, we have the two components of a human being, flesh and soul. 

 

 

Hell 

 

Here, I will discuss the necessity of the existence of Hell, as opposed to the NDE accounts of those who claim they went to hell and the details of such. I think that perhaps in a later post, I could go into the details, but for now, I find the biggest problem with people and their understanding of hell is that if God is love, then Hell shouldn’t exist, but the opposite is true. Hell seems like it must exist for at least two reasons. One being that if God made free creatures so innately valuable that it would be wrong even for Him to annihilate, then it seems He must have a place where this is possible avoid. It seems to me that the intrinsic value comes from Genesis 1:26, where God says, “Let us create man in our image, in our likeness, that they may have dominion over the plants and animals…” (paraphrase). The idea here is that God created human beings to rule (have dominion) over everything in the world. I often find that people try to ascribe or read into the text more meaning to the phrase, “the image of God” than what is found in the text. What we do find in the text is the aspect of ruling. In what way are you made in the image of God? The text simply discusses having dominion, or rule. Now, It also seems that in order to rule, we must also have some necessary components as well, such as judgment. The ability to rule well requires good judgment. This is one component of human beings that I believe makes us intrinsically valuable; the fact that we are made in this very specific aspect of the image of God. 

Second, God cannot be near sin, at least long term. For instance, The Bible teaches that Moses could not see the face of God because of sin, and also, that in the Revelation, the Throne of God is described as having a sea of glass around it that no one can cross (See Rev. 4:6). The reason many scholars see this sea of glass as a symbol of protection is because John was in prison in Patmos, which is an island, and the island itself was a prison, surrounded by the sea. It seems that this sea in the Revelation in front of the Throne of God is due to sin, for in Revelation 21:1, we find that “the sea is no more” in the view of the New Jerusalem. 

In regard to the question of universalism, I think a good question on top of all this is, “Would it be loving if God were to force someone against their will to go to heaven?” and “If He did force people to go to heaven against their will, then did people ever actually have free will in the first place?” It seems that there are multiple levels of inconsistencies with such beliefs. 

So, God has a place for those who reject Him where they are not annihilated. On top of all of this, God is a just Judge. The way we live our lives actually matters, because at the end of our lives we will be judged. Hebrews 9:27 says that “it is appointed unto man once to die, then comes the judgment.” God is Love, but that is not all He is. He is also a just Judge. Hell must exist because God will not annihilate an innately valuable soul, and because sin cannot exist in His presence for any significant amount of time. 

Romans 5:8 says, “God demonstrates His own love for us in this: that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.” If Christianity is true, then those who put their hope and trust and lives in Jesus alone simply change location. We never actually die. From His work on the cross, we are saved from the wrath of God, but we are also blessed with eternal life. I pray that we strive to live by the influence of these truths. 

 

“For God so loved the world that He gave His one and only Son that whosoever believes in Him shall not perish but will have everlasting life.” ~John 3:16




Written by Nace Howell through the grace of the Lord Jesus


© Nace Howell, 2022




[1] J. P. Moreland, The Soul: How we know it’s real and why it matters (Chicago: Moody Publishers, 2014), 124.

[2] Ibid., 132.

[3] Jeffrey Long, Evidence of the Afterlife: The Science of Near-Death Experiences (New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 2010), 7.

[4] See Genesis 2:15.

[5] John 20:15-17.

[6] John 14:1-3.

[7] See Revelation 21:25.

[8] John 10:7-10.

[9] Revelation 21:23-25.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Objectivity is the Language of Heaven

By
NDErs (i. e. people who have claimed to have had a   Near Death Experience ) often report that when they go to Heaven, they frequently see and recognize people such as friends and family members. It is often also reported that when they were communicating with friends and relatives, they realized that they weren’t speaking English, but that they were telepathically speaking to one another.   It seems it would be impossible to have communication with others without learning every language that has ever existed under the sun, but since heaven is a perfect place, [1]  then communication should be perfect as well. In other words, it seems unlikely that there are barriers to communication. So, I should be able to communicate with the Apostles, upon my arrival for instance, but how? I personally only really know how to speak English fluently. My Spanish, Japanese, German, Russian, Chinese, and Latin is like that of a child, and my Greek is only in reading and writing.  If ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Self-tests of Some of the World's Religions

By
It is fairly common for a religion of the world to give itself a sort of test for truth, since this is one question that is asked of any religion: “Why should I believe what you are telling me is true?” After all, the answer to such a question will ultimately result in followers of specific beliefs and doctrines, let alone religions, or will result in a lack of followers.  If a religion can answer this question posed by seekers and thinkers, and therefore train its adherents to be able to answer why a religion is true, this will inevitably help people believe in such, even if the claims are false. If there is no answer, this is where a religion will perhaps find more trouble for itself.  Many religions make an appeal to a higher authority, namely,  God , for the veracity of their existence and as a result, no one can question the truth from such an authority. This is correct in a sense, that  if in fact God is making such a claim, then what is said or stated is true ...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to Show a Mormon the Difference Between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus

By
I find that Mormons frequently claim that they are Christians, and that they want to be referred to as Christians, and that they have even recently sought to distance themselves from the word “Mormon.” The problem is, they worship another Jesus, and here is how to show them the difference between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus. Before we get to that, some clarifications are necessary. Specifically, that they cannot even distance themselves from being called "Mormons."   The Mormon President Russell Nelson said,    “What’s in a name or, in this case, a nickname? When it comes to nicknames of the Church, such as the “LDS Church,” the “Mormon Church,” or the “Church of the Latter-day Saints,” the most important thing in those names is the absence of the Savior’s name. To remove the Lord’s name from the Lord’s Church is a major victory for Satan. When we discard the Savior’s name, we are subtly disregarding all that Jesus Christ did for us—even His Atonement.” [1] ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Highest Virtue

By
A virtue is a trait of excellence. What is the highest virtue? It seems that based on the nature of truth, that truth itself is perhaps the highest virtue. For instance, I could say that love is the highest virtue, but then I could ask the question of whether that is true or not. If it is or isn’t true, this places truth virtuously higher than love, at least in some sense. The fact that I can question love through the lens of truth seems to place truth above love in height of virtue. On the other hand, if I said that truth is the highest virtue, then it seems that it would be loving to tell others the truth! Perhaps truth and love go hand in hand, but this also concerns the nature of what truth is.  Truth is a requirement for love, which I argue here , but is love a requirement for truth? Love must contain truth in order to be  true  love. But truth does not have to contain love in order to be true truth. Take for instance, mathematics, or numbers in general… Sometimes, t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Who Made God? Identifying Categorical Errors

By
A category is simply a distinct class to which something belongs… A set of objects that can be treated as equal in some way. A Macintosh apple belongs to the category, apple, and not what we categorize as an orange. Similarly, colors are in a different category than taste.   When we say, “apples and oranges” what we mean is that there has been a confusion of categories. Sure, they are both fruit, but when you examine both, there is an obvious difference. An apple is not an orange, and an orange is not an apple. Macintosh, Granny Smith, and red delicious are all apples. Navel, blood, and Valencia are all oranges. To mix the two, for instance, to call a navel orange an apple, would be a categorical error, sometimes referred to as a category mistake.      How Identifying Categorical Errors can Help with Apologetics It seems that simply learning about or being reminded of categorical errors can help us be more aware of them. We have all heard or thought of ourselves, the...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Dividing Line of Doctrine

By
How and Where to Make Divisions... Sometimes, I get asked “Why do you get so up at arms about other religions?” or, “Why do you pick on other religions so much?” I think the following will help you see where I’m coming from, before I spill the beans on such.   We have difficulty sometimes in discovering where to make divisions when considering where to spend our money, and who to support, where to make purchases, and where not to do such. We also often have difficulty on how to know if a church or a congregation is a place where someone can actually become saved. Like, how can we know that a Mormon is likely not saved but we can know that a regular church attender at a gospel sound church is likely saved? What is it that would make my church attendance at a specific body no longer appropriate? Both answers to these questions deal with doctrine. If a company is pushing false doctrine using their influence and power to push a heretical doctrine or teaching, this is often when the red...
Post a Comment
Read more

Two Problems Jesus has with the Mormon Doctrine of Eternal Families

By
Mormonism teaches that those who are married in a temple can be married for eternity. In Doctrine and Covenants 132:15–20, we find the following:   15 Therefore, if a man marry him a wife in the world, and he marry her not by me nor by my word , and he covenant with her so long as he is in the world and she with him, their covenant and marriage are not of force when they are dead , and when they are out of the world; therefore, they are not bound by any law when they are out of the world. 16 Therefore, when they are out of the world they neither marry nor are given in marriage; but are appointed angels in heaven, which angels are ministering servants, to minister for those who are worthy of a far more, and an exceeding, and an eternal weight of glory. 17 For these angels did not abide my law; therefore, they cannot be enlarged, but remain separately and singly, without exaltation, in their saved condition, to all eternity; and from henceforth are not gods, but are angels of God for...
Post a Comment
Read more

Using Guilt to Guide to the Truth

By
While taking a cultural apologetics class in my doctorate, I rambled along in a 30-page paper and in it, I wrote that, “I define religion as an anthropological system consisting of worship which is often filled with specific sacred rituals that seeks to appease or eradicate guilt.” My professor red-penned this and said that I am not yet in an authoritative position to make such definitions. But I was never asked how I came up with such a definition. The thing is, working on my second post-graduate degree in apologetics, studying many other religions on a deeper level was inevitable, and  by this, I noticed a pattern in all of them which was the fact that they all seek to appease or eradicate guilt, including   Buddhism , even though   many adherents of Buddhism claim that it is not a religion . The point is that all religions seek to eradicate guilt on some level, because   guilt crosses all cultures and times, to all people .   Guilt transcends all people. The ...
4 comments
Read more

Baptism is Not Necessary for Salvation According to the Early Church

By
Let’s dive right in. The Bible says in Acts 2:37-41,    Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?” And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is for you and for your children and for all who are far off, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself.” And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, “Save yourselves from this crooked generation.” So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls.   The phrase in Acts 2:38 that reads, “for the forgiveness of your sins” modifies the word repentance, not the word baptism.  See more about this Here .   What is interesting is that those who translate the above verse as meaning that baptism is a requ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Evidence and Power of Testimony

By
What to say to People who Demand more Evidence for God. Why is there something rather than nothing? Glacier National Park. © Nace Howell, 2018. The question is, how much evidence do you require? Would Jesus have to come back and slap you in the face with evidence that He is God? It seems to me that there is a line we must draw. We do this in all other areas of our lives, so why would we treat theism any different? When a court convicts, they do so “beyond a reasonable doubt.” I would like to take a few moments to explore this a bit. But before we get to that, I want to pose a question, which is… why are you the standard? What makes you think He has to prove His existence to everyone individually? He already created the universe from nothing. In the beginning, there was a big bang. Seriously… do you believe your mom when she tells you a story about her day? Did you believe the reports of 9/11 when they were happening? Do you accept the testimony of anything you hear on social ...
33 comments
Read more