Skip to main content

The Dividing Line of Doctrine

How and Where to Make Divisions...

Sometimes, I get asked “Why do you get so up at arms about other religions?” or, “Why do you pick on other religions so much?” I think the following will help you see where I’m coming from, before I spill the beans on such. 

We have difficulty sometimes in discovering where to make divisions when considering where to spend our money, and who to support, where to make purchases, and where not to do such. We also often have difficulty on how to know if a church or a congregation is a place where someone can actually become saved. Like, how can we know that a Mormon is likely not saved but we can know that a regular church attender at a gospel sound church is likely saved? What is it that would make my church attendance at a specific body no longer appropriate?

Both answers to these questions deal with doctrine. If a company is pushing false doctrine using their influence and power to push a heretical doctrine or teaching, this is often when the red flags fly. “Non-essentials” aside for now, the question is where do we draw the line. I think that the Bible calls us to make certain divisions, which we will also get to in a moment.

Similarly, when a religious organization has doctrines that are heretical, then a person who claims to be a part of that organization and follows the doctrines therein, then if those doctrines are false according to scripture and Christian doctrine, then it can rightly be argued that such a person is not saved. 

If the doctrines within an organization are false, and a person is under that organization and believes the things they teach, then there is a major problem. 

Consider Matthew 7:15-23, which says, 

 

“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. 16 You will recognize them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? 17 So, every healthy tree bears good fruit, but the diseased tree bears bad fruit. 18 A healthy tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a diseased tree bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Thus you will recognize them by their fruits.

21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22 On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ 23 And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’

 

This passage should be quite sobering. Whatever a church teaches must come under one of two things… that which is essential or non-essential. Essential to salvation or non-essential to salvation.


Why should we beware of false prophets? What is Jesus saying in this passage? What does a false prophet teach? A false gospel! Jesus is implying this is the text above. “Beware of false prophets who come to you in sheep’s clothing…” what they teach sounds very attractive. But inwardly they are like snarling wolves. He says that you will recognizing them by their fruits. The question is, are we examining their fruit closely enough? 

I think this all boils down to doctrine. If we have a false prophet teaching a false doctrine or a false gospel, what does this amount to? Remember what Jesus says… “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’

A false prophet bringing a false doctrine or false teaching will result (according to Jesus) in a false salvation. “I never knew you; depart from me…” This is why doctrine is so important. Doctrine and teaching is the dividing line. This is just another reason we cannot just read the Bible superficially. We need to be textual archaeologists and excavate the text. We should always seek to know what it means. 

If you are in an organization that teaches a false doctrine, and adhere to those doctrines, then you have a false salvation. Think of it like this: False prophets + False gospel = False salvation. When it comes to false prophets and teachers, the Bible is acutely aware of it based on how often it tells us to stand firm and be on our guard. 

What is a false gospel? Anything that is different than what we see in the Bible. This would be every other religion apart from Christianity. What is the Law of Non-contradiction? Something cannot be both true and false at the same time and in the same sense. Keep Galatians 1:6-8 in mind and take notice my emphasis…

 

 “I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel— 7 not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. 8 But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. 9 As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed.”

 

If you thought you were in the clear because you are not a false prophet, but are just a simpleton under the false prophet, Jesus says to you as well, “I never knew you; depart from me…” It is not just the false prophet, but it is also those who were under the false prophet. A false gospel is anything that contradicts the gospel that we find in the Bible. It seems that “works” is the one dividing line that is most blatant and most clear that is contrary from one gospel to the next, though there is no other gospel. Which is what Galatians is about. Galatians is an apologetic against a false gospel of works. Paul is speaking chronologically, in that the Galatians have already grabbed on to the true gospel (Galatians 1:6), but he is astonished that they are so quickly turning from it. He is astonished that they are trying to add works to their salvation. 

Again, Paul says, “I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel—not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ” (Galatians 1:6-7).

John says, “The Law came through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.” We are set free! This is why Paul is losing his mind here… He says, “I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel…” 

What manner of “contrary” is Paul talking about in Galatians? I would say that it is the dividing line is between works and grace. The reason for this is because Galatians is all about circumcision, respectively. The issue in Galatians 1:6-9 is that the Galatians have been suckered into believing by the Judaizers that circumcision is a requirement for salvation. But Paul corrects them. He was acutely aware of true salvation that sets a person free. 

He knew that our salvation produces works, and that our works do not produce our salvation. 2 Corinthians 5:17 says that “If anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. Old things have passed away and behold, all things have become like new.” Completely new! So new that the way you see yourself as well as other people will completely change. Not only do we not have to earn our salvation, but we couldn’t if we tried. The Bible says that all have sinned and fall short of God’s glory, and as sinners we are unable to lift ourselves up by our own bootstraps. We need the life-saving grace of Jesus.

 
The Dividing Line Between Works-based Salvation and Grace-based Salvation is Doctrine 

Jehovah’ Witnesses, for instance, teach that Jesus is Michael the archangel. They teach that the nature of Jesus is not deity, that He is not God in the flesh. The question here should be, is such a Jesus sufficient for salvation? 2 Corinthians 11:4 teaches that there are “other Jesus’s” and people put up with them readily enough. But it seems that a Jesus that is not divine is an insufficient savior. Should we put up with such a teaching about Jesus? Certainly not! Jehovah’s Witnesses teach a false nature about of Jesus, a false doctrine. Their Jesus is fundamentally different that the Biblical Jesus and is insufficient for salvation. He is insufficient because He is not God, so how could He forgive anyone’s sin? If they say that He is not really a human being, then how could He be the perfect sacrifice? The answer is that The Jehovah’s Witness Jesus is a false Jesus, and anyone who believes in such a Jesus will find themselves in the same boat as those to whom Jesus says, “Depart from me; I never knew you…”

Sometimes I get asked “Why do you get so up at arms about other religions?” The reason is because they amount to a false salvation. This means that there will be people who will not be in heaven, as sad as that is, because they did not have true faith, they didn’t have the one, true Jesus “take away their sin” (see John 1:29).

 


Written by Nace Howell through the grace of the Lord Jesus




© Nace Howell, 2023

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Evidence and Power of Testimony: The Apostolic Witness

What to say to People who Demand more Evidence for God. Why is there something rather than nothing? Glacier National Park. © Nace Howell, 2018. The question is, how much evidence do you require? Would Jesus have to come back and slap you in the face with evidence that He is God? It seems to me that there is a line we must draw. We do this in all other areas of our lives, so why would we treat theism any different? When a court convicts, they do so “beyond a reasonable doubt.” I would like to take a few moments to explore this a bit. But before we get to that, I want to pose a question, which is… why are you the standard? What makes you think He has to prove His existence to everyone individually? He already created the universe from nothing. In the beginning, there was a big bang. Seriously… do you believe your mom when she tells you a story about her day? Did you believe the reports of 9/11 when they were happening? Do you accept the testimony of anything you hear on social ...

Defending Christianity against Jehovah’s Witnesses

Defending Christianity against Jehovah’s Witnesses Using much of their “bible” to refute them “But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect ” (NIV 1 Peter 3:15). In other words, LOVE THEM . Jehovah’s Witnesses                                       Biblical Truths Jehovah’s Witnesses do not believe in the Trinity. J.Ws. believe that Jesus was a “little god” (lower case g). J.Ws. believe in a different “ Jesus ” because of the NWT accounts. J.Ws. call themselves “Christians.” J.Ws. believe Jesus is not to be worshiped. J.Ws. believe that Jesus was once, and is again, Michael the archangel. Genesis 1:26 says, “Let Us crea...

Defending Christianity against Mormonism

“But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect ” (NIV 1 Peter 3:15). In other words, LOVE THEM . Mormons                                                             Biblical Truths Mormons are monolaters, meaning, they believe in many gods, yet worship only one. LDS believe that “As man is, God once was; and as God is, man may become.” LDS do not believe in Hell. LDS believe God is flesh and bones. LDS believe in baptism for the dead. LDS believe Jesus and Satan are created brothers. L...

The God of the Killdozer Operator, Marvin Heemeyer

While working toward becoming an apologist and a pastor, I was a heavy equipment operator. I have over 15 years’ experience in the field, focusing on hydrological restorations (stream bank and river restoration and water dam removals) and site development for building pads (ranging from houses to one million + sq. ft. warehouses). I say this because I want to show where the heart for writing article this came about. Marvin Heemeyer purchased a bulldozer from an auction which was a Komatsu D355A with an operating weight of 97,907 lbs. (this does not include the weight of Heemeyer’s fabricated addition). In the picture above, I am operating a Komatsu D155AX which has an operating weight of 89,300 lbs. (If I remember correctly, we were developing the site for a 550,000 sq. ft. warehouse building pad). Heemeyer then went on a rampage in his armored bulldozer in Granby, CO. I don’t want to go into great details about what led up to Heemeyer doing what he did, nor do I want to go into great ...

An Overlooked Argument Against the Book of Mormon

The Book of Mormon is written in a style of language that was not used by anyone at the time that it was written and published. This style of English is called   Early Modern English . This fact is an anachronism that I find to be severely overlooked by those who seek the truth about the Book of Mormon. Many Mormons will instantly write this objection off concerning the veracity of the Book of Mormon, even to the point of saying that such an objection is lazy and pitiful, while not giving any rebuttals worth their weight.   I recently insinuated the absurdity of the Book of Mormon by asking the question, “Why was the Book of Mormon translated into Early Modern English?” I’m saying that it is absurd that the BoM uses an out-of-date language. A Mormon replied to me that the Bible has equal absurdities. He said, “Why is [The BoM translation into Early Modern English] absurd? Is it absurd that God uses a donkey to speak to Balaam in Numbers 22?”  First, this is a  tu quo...

Using Guilt to Guide to the Truth

While taking a cultural apologetics class in my doctorate, I rambled along in a 30-page paper and in it, I wrote that, “I define religion as an anthropological system consisting of worship which is often filled with specific sacred rituals that seeks to appease or eradicate guilt.” My professor red-penned this and said that I am not yet in an authoritative position to make such definitions. But I was never asked how I came up with such a definition. The thing is, working on my second post-graduate degree in apologetics, studying many other religions on a deeper level was inevitable, and  by this, I noticed a pattern in all of them which was the fact that they all seek to appease or eradicate guilt, including   Buddhism , even though   many adherents of Buddhism claim that it is not a religion . The point is that all religions seek to eradicate guilt on some level, because   guilt crosses all cultures and times, to all people .   Guilt transcends all people. The ...

Joseph Smith had the same Demon that influenced Muhammad

What does Islam have in common with Mormonism? Seriously, the similarities are uncanny. Like human beings, demons are creatures of habit . The Bible does not tell us much about them, but from what it does tell us, we can learn a lot. Jesus reveals to us some things about their behavior: When the unclean spirit has gone out of a person, it passes through waterless places seeking rest, but finds none. Then it says, ‘I will return to my house from which I came.’ And when it comes, it finds the house empty, swept, and put in order. Then it goes and brings with it seven other spirits more evil than itself, and they enter and dwell there, and the last state of that person is worse than the first… [1]   Jesus clearly knows that demons have typical behaviors. He has seen it many times before. He lets us know that a typical behavior for a demon is that home is where the heart is . When your house crumbles to the ground, you move to a new one. Likewise, when a person dies, the demon ...

How to Show a Jehovah's Witness That Jesus Was—and Still Should Be—Worshiped

Jehovah’s Witnesses  (JW’s) have a severe problem with the question of worship when it comes to Jesus. They say that Jesus is not God, and that because of the First of  the Ten Commandments , we should not worship Him. Is this correct thinking biblically speaking? In this article, I will argue why it is not correct, and I will do this from the New World Translation (NWT) which is the  Jehovah’s Witness corrupted version of the Bible . Allow me to briefly say here that they believe that Jesus is a “lower case g” god, which immediately has scriptural issues in their own translation with the First of the Ten Commandments, namely that they would have “other gods besides me” (NWT of the First of the Ten Commandments).   First, since I have argued in multiple places concerning John 1:1 that Jesus is God, which implies our worship of Him, I will direct you to those articles  HERE ,  HERE , and  HERE .  Moving forward, I want to look at three specific pri...

Baptism is Not Necessary for Salvation According to the Early Church

Let’s dive right in. The Bible says in Acts 2:37-41,    Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?” And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is for you and for your children and for all who are far off, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself.” And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, “Save yourselves from this crooked generation.” So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls.   The phrase in Acts 2:38 that reads, “for the forgiveness of your sins” modifies the word repentance, not the word baptism.  See more about this Here .   What is interesting is that those who translate the above verse as meaning that baptism is a requ...

The Jehovah's Witness Training Videos

How your conversation will likely go with a Jehovah's Witness. The Videos… they have all seen them. The videos that they have seen are like when you start a new job and watch these old, poor quality, cheesy DVDs (or VHS) about how your job is performed safely. You’re sitting in the room alone for three hours and fifteen minutes, watching everyone in their PPE do the wrong things and then the right things, so you can know the difference between them. Anyone who has worked at Wal-Mart, or a factory, or is a heavy equipment operator knows exactly what “the videos” look and sound like.  Jehovah’s Witnesses (Hereafter, JWs) must go through a similar situation because their responses to my questions and challenges is exactly the same, often verbatim, every time. I have to assume that they have all seen the same video. I have not seen the videos myself, but I definitely seem to have a cumulative case for believing that they exist. Granted, this group of JWs I'm referring to are the ...