Piling On the Burden: Mormonism and Its Historical Claims

Is it safe to conclude that because there is no archaeological evidence for the Book of Mormon that it is false?

The most highly prized, primary text in Mormonism (The Book of Mormon) makes the claims that there have been vast amounts of people (Jarom 1:8), involved in great wars in North America (Mormon 6:6-15), with swords, arrows, darts, javelins, etc. made of steel (Ether 7:9; Jarom 1:8), also having farming equipment made of steel (Jarom 1:8), and numerous minted coins of various worth (Alma 11:4-19). This is not even close to being an exhaustive list of archaeological issues found in the Book of Mormon. We could go on discussing chariots, horses, wheat, the use of Early Modern English in the Book of Mormon, and many others…

“The book of Mormon makes some extraordinary claims about there being wars with large numbers of warriors in the Americas. The problem with this is that there has been no archaeological evidence to support these claims that the Book of Mormon makes.”[1] I recently shared this quote from my book on social media, and an objection was made that it could be an argument from silence. He said that it is similar to the objection concerning the exodus, hinting that there is no archaeological evidence found concerning the exodus. First, there is archaeological evidence for the exodus,[2] second, to compare the Bible with the Book of Mormon is a false analogy, and third, because Mormons are asking people to accept the claims of the Book of Mormon, the burden of proof is on them. The burden of proof is on the Book of Mormon for making the claims that it does.

As far as the exodus is concerned, not only do we have proto-Israelite building foundations in Egypt, the Merneptah Stele, and several other archaeological evidences,[3] but we also have the book of Exodus itself. The Bible is not one book, but several books bound together. The book of Exodus found in the Bible is a book that recalls back to the time of the exodus through the memories of the author. He (Moses) wrote down the events of the exodus from Egypt, and this text is another thing we can add to the list of evidence for the exodus. We are not circularly “proving the Bible with the Bible,” but we can understand that the Bible contains the book of Exodus, which is ancient evidence for the exodus in a cumulative case. Like it or not, the book of Exodus is indeed evidence for the exodus.

Concerning the historical claims of the Book of Mormon, of all the construction projects that have happened in America, we were bound to run into something. We are building and building like never before, breaking new ground every day. This requires site development, and site development requires excavation. In our excavations, never have we found any coins, swords, farm equipment, steel, or anything remotely close to what the Book of Mormon describes. This fact makes time and archaeology, specifically enemies against such claims, since it seems that we have had endless amounts of time "looking" for such things without actually looking specifically, based on innumerable construction sites around the country.

Archaeology is a natural byproduct of the construction world. I was personally a heavy equipment operator for over a decade, and all the archaeologists that I have ever worked with were only concerned with modern burials (coffins) and American Indian remains and artifacts.[4] Why? Because we can know beyond reasonable doubt that nothing else archaeologically speaking is in the ground, or we would know about it. Archaeologists are not concerned with running into Mormon antiquities because there aren’t any. In Israel, by comparison, bulldozers are illegal to use in many places because the ancient antiquities below the surface are so rich in number. It does not even register to such a standard in America, even though, according to the Book of Mormon, it should.

The reason comparing the history of the Book of Mormon to the history of the Bible is a false analogy is because there is no archaeological evidence for any event that takes place in the Book of Mormon, but there is much archaeological evidence for many events that take place in the Bible. They are clearly in completely different categories. The difference is evident. There is no credible archaeological evidence for the Book of Mormon.

So, is it an argument from silence to say that there has been no archaeological evidence ever been found for the Book of Mormon? Not an argument from silence, but because the Book of Mormon makes such historical claims, Mormons bear the burden of proof because of such claims. Evidence matters, and the burden of proof is on them. The more they compare the Book of Mormon to the Bible, because the more biblical claims, events, people, and customs that are confirmed through archaeology,[5] and the more construction projects that we have in America without finding anything regarding or confirming Mormon historical claims, this means the heavier the burden of proof becomes on Mormonism. I find this to be a major reason people leave the Mormon faith.

So, is it safe to conclude that because there is no archaeological evidence for the Book of Mormon that Mormonism is false? Until they can bear the burden by proving the claims in the Book of Mormon are true, everything is unproven. The question is when does one draw the line…

Written by Nace Howell through the grace of the Lord Jesus

[1] Howell, Nace. Mormonism: Impossible: Refuting a Fundamental Mormon Doctrine and Using Apologetics to Reach the Latter-day Saints. Maitland: Xulon Press, 2023. 120. https://www.amazon.com/Mormonism-Refuting-Fundamental-Apologetics-Latter-Day/dp/1662885377/

[2] https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-topics/exodus/exodus-fact-or-fiction/.

[3] https://www.patternsofevidence.com/2019/06/01/artifacts-show-biblical-exodus/.

[4] I have personally been on job sites that had moved 800,000 yards of dirt, which is not uncommon on American soil.

[5] As well as confirming other ancient texts, such as Herodotus’ Histories, concerning which it is said, “archaeology graphically confirms Herodotus's observations.” (Welsby, Derek. The Kingdom of Kush. London: British Museum Press. 1996. Consider also the extreme archaeological discoveries surrounding Alexander the Great, King Tutankhamen, Constantine, and other historical figures.

Comments

The Evidence and Power of Testimony: The Apostolic Witness

What to say to People who Demand more Evidence for God. Why is there something rather than nothing? Glacier National Park. © Nace Howell, 2018. The question is, how much evidence do you require? Would Jesus have to come back and slap you in the face with evidence that He is God? It seems to me that there is a line we must draw. We do this in all other areas of our lives, so why would we treat theism any different? When a court convicts, they do so “beyond a reasonable doubt.” I would like to take a few moments to explore this a bit. But before we get to that, I want to pose a question, which is… why are you the standard? What makes you think He has to prove His existence to everyone individually? He already created the universe from nothing. In the beginning, there was a big bang. Seriously… do you believe your mom when she tells you a story about her day? Did you believe the reports of 9/11 when they were happening? Do you accept the testimony of anything you hear on social ...

Defending Christianity against Jehovah’s Witnesses

Defending Christianity against Jehovah’s Witnesses Using much of their “bible” to refute them “But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect ” (NIV 1 Peter 3:15). In other words, LOVE THEM . Jehovah’s Witnesses Biblical Truths Jehovah’s Witnesses do not believe in the Trinity. J.Ws. believe that Jesus was a “little god” (lower case g). J.Ws. believe in a different “ Jesus ” because of the NWT accounts. J.Ws. call themselves “Christians.” J.Ws. believe Jesus is not to be worshiped. J.Ws. believe that Jesus was once, and is again, Michael the archangel. Genesis 1:26 says, “Let Us crea...

The God of the Killdozer Operator, Marvin Heemeyer

While working toward becoming an apologist and a pastor, I was a heavy equipment operator. I have over 15 years’ experience in the field, focusing on hydrological restorations (stream bank and river restoration and water dam removals) and site development for building pads (ranging from houses to one million + sq. ft. warehouses). I say this because I want to show where the heart for writing article this came about. Marvin Heemeyer purchased a bulldozer from an auction which was a Komatsu D355A with an operating weight of 97,907 lbs. (this does not include the weight of Heemeyer’s fabricated addition). In the picture above, I am operating a Komatsu D155AX which has an operating weight of 89,300 lbs. (If I remember correctly, we were developing the site for a 550,000 sq. ft. warehouse building pad). Heemeyer then went on a rampage in his armored bulldozer in Granby, CO. I don’t want to go into great details about what led up to Heemeyer doing what he did, nor do I want to go into great ...

Using Guilt to Guide to the Truth

While taking a cultural apologetics class in my doctorate, I rambled along in a 30-page paper and in it, I wrote that, “I define religion as an anthropological system consisting of worship which is often filled with specific sacred rituals that seeks to appease or eradicate guilt.” My professor red-penned this and said that I am not yet in an authoritative position to make such definitions. But I was never asked how I came up with such a definition. The thing is, working on my second post-graduate degree in apologetics, studying many other religions on a deeper level was inevitable, and by this, I noticed a pattern in all of them which was the fact that they all seek to appease or eradicate guilt, including Buddhism , even though many adherents of Buddhism claim that it is not a religion . The point is that all religions seek to eradicate guilt on some level, because guilt crosses all cultures and times, to all people . Guilt transcends all people. The ...

An Overlooked Argument Against the Book of Mormon

The Book of Mormon is written in a style of language that was not used by anyone at the time that it was written and published. This style of English is called Early Modern English . This fact is an anachronism that I find to be severely overlooked by those who seek the truth about the Book of Mormon. Many Mormons will instantly write this objection off concerning the veracity of the Book of Mormon, even to the point of saying that such an objection is lazy and pitiful, while not giving any rebuttals worth their weight. I recently insinuated the absurdity of the Book of Mormon by asking the question, “Why was the Book of Mormon translated into Early Modern English?” I’m saying that it is absurd that the BoM uses an out-of-date language. A Mormon replied to me that the Bible has equal absurdities. He said, “Why is [The BoM translation into Early Modern English] absurd? Is it absurd that God uses a donkey to speak to Balaam in Numbers 22?” First, this is a tu quo...

Defending Christianity against Mormonism

“But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect ” (NIV 1 Peter 3:15). In other words, LOVE THEM . Mormons Biblical Truths Mormons are monolaters, meaning, they believe in many gods, yet worship only one. LDS believe that “As man is, God once was; and as God is, man may become.” LDS do not believe in Hell. LDS believe God is flesh and bones. LDS believe in baptism for the dead. LDS believe Jesus and Satan are created brothers. L...

Baptism is Not Necessary for Salvation According to the Early Church

Let’s dive right in. The Bible says in Acts 2:37-41, Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?” And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is for you and for your children and for all who are far off, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself.” And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, “Save yourselves from this crooked generation.” So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls. The phrase in Acts 2:38 that reads, “for the forgiveness of your sins” modifies the word repentance, not the word baptism. See more about this Here . What is interesting is that those who translate the above verse as meaning that baptism is a requ...

Self-tests of Some of the World's Religions

It is fairly common for a religion of the world to give itself a sort of test for truth, since this is one question that is asked of any religion: “Why should I believe what you are telling me is true?” After all, the answer to such a question will ultimately result in followers of specific beliefs and doctrines, let alone religions, or will result in a lack of followers. If a religion can answer this question posed by seekers and thinkers, and therefore train its adherents to be able to answer why a religion is true, this will inevitably help people believe in such, even if the claims are false. If there is no answer, this is where a religion will perhaps find more trouble for itself. Many religions make an appeal to a higher authority, namely, God , for the veracity of their existence and as a result, no one can question the truth from such an authority. This is correct in a sense, that if in fact God is making such a claim, then what is said or stated is true ...

How to Show a Jehovah's Witness That Jesus Was—and Still Should Be—Worshiped

Jehovah’s Witnesses (JW’s) have a severe problem with the question of worship when it comes to Jesus. They say that Jesus is not God, and that because of the First of the Ten Commandments , we should not worship Him. Is this correct thinking biblically speaking? In this article, I will argue why it is not correct, and I will do this from the New World Translation (NWT) which is the Jehovah’s Witness corrupted version of the Bible . Allow me to briefly say here that they believe that Jesus is a “lower case g” god, which immediately has scriptural issues in their own translation with the First of the Ten Commandments, namely that they would have “other gods besides me” (NWT of the First of the Ten Commandments). First, since I have argued in multiple places concerning John 1:1 that Jesus is God, which implies our worship of Him, I will direct you to those articles HERE , HERE , and HERE . Moving forward, I want to look at three specific pri...

The Jehovah's Witness Training Videos

How your conversation will likely go with a Jehovah's Witness. The Videos… they have all seen them. The videos that they have seen are like when you start a new job and watch these old, poor quality, cheesy DVDs (or VHS) about how your job is performed safely. You’re sitting in the room alone for three hours and fifteen minutes, watching everyone in their PPE do the wrong things and then the right things, so you can know the difference between them. Anyone who has worked at Wal-Mart, or a factory, or is a heavy equipment operator knows exactly what “the videos” look and sound like. Jehovah’s Witnesses (Hereafter, JWs) must go through a similar situation because their responses to my questions and challenges is exactly the same, often verbatim, every time. I have to assume that they have all seen the same video. I have not seen the videos myself, but I definitely seem to have a cumulative case for believing that they exist. Granted, this group of JWs I'm referring to are the ...

Apologetics and Evidence

Search This Blog